City Council Minutes 1996 11 06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Sisk felt that in instances like these where the City has an expenditure of time and attorney's fees, it is something the developer should have to pay. Tami Tanoue, Griffiths & Tanoue, stated that perhaps an application fee could be established by ordinance or resolution. For the vacation itself, compensation would not be appropriate. She will be looking into it. Sisk moved that Council approve Ordinance No. 1233, Series 1996, vacating the storm drainage and utility easement in Louisville North, First Filing, seconded by Keany. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 5 - 0 vote with Howard being absent and Levihn arriving late to the meeting. MARTENS ANNEXATION RESOLUTION NO. 67, SERIES 1996 - FINDING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE OF AN ANNEXATION PETITION FILED WITH THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE, COLORADO, KNOWN AS THE MARTENS ANNEXATION, AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON Paul Wood, Planning Director, in speaking on Resolution No. 67, Ordinance No. 1234, and Ordinance No. 1235, that this is a voluntary annexation of approximately six acres at 1212 South 96th Street, directly north of the Johnson property. The property is occupied by a single family home with the accessory out-buildings. The property is divided into two parcels with the residence located on the front one and one-half acres along South 96th with the balance of the property undeveloped. Planning Commission reviewed the annexation and zoning on October 8 and supported the annexation and zoning of Agricultural. Concerning Ordinance No. 1234, based on August 20 Council comments, staff had incorporated the following provision into the annexation agreement: 1. ) Waiver of the Capital Improvement Fee for the residential unit. This fee would not be assessed for an existing residential structure or the replacement of that structure. 2.) Louisville will not require "Owner" to dedicate, transfer, or convey any water rights, nor require "Owner" to pay any fee in lieu thereof, to Louisville as a condition of the annexation of the property. The Owner, at the time of subdivision and/or PUD approval, shall pay a water resource fee for raw water acquisition in accordance with Resolution No. 52, Series 1988, as amended by Resolution No.9, Series 1989. Wood stated that the applicant requested, in addition, if the property is developed as an indoor/outdoor tennis facility, the open space dedication requirement be waived at the time of platting the property. The applicant also request reimbursement of the $660 annexation fee which was paid at the time the annexation petition was submitted. Ordinance No. 1235 zoned the property Agricultural which the Planning Commission had approved. 3