Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 11 17

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes October 20, 2014 Page 9 of 12 Stewart asked what if they just reapply. Robinson stated they could not come back with the same request until after one year from the time of decision. Watson asked the applicant if they would like to proceed tonight or continue the request. Gstalder stated they would prefer to proceed. He stated the suggestions he heard tonight sounded very expensive. Stewart stated preservation isn't necessarily more expensive than new construction. Watson stated this structure is iconic and this is a major fabric of the character of the building. Gstalder is concerned about retaining the siding and having it be the best long term solution for this building. Watson stated there are a lot of reasons why there is moisture that aren't specifically related to the siding. Haley asked if Chuck Sanders, the project architect, had any suggestions. Gstalder stated he recommended removing the damaged boards and replacing with new boards and caulking. Fasick asked if an historic structure assessment was done. Robinson stated it was completed by Chuck Sanders and he recommended to repair and replace as needed. Fasick made a motion to approve the resolution, with the condition the existing siding is documented prior to removal. Echohawk seconded the motion. Stewart recommended a no vote because it does not comply with the criteria established in the LMC, specifically as they speak towards to the removal of historic materials and that damaged historic materials should be repaired and not replaced. The motion to approve the resolution was denied 4 to 2, with Fasick and Echohawk voting for the resolution. Robinson asked for a motion to deny the resolution in case they want to appeal to City Council. Watson asked the applicant if they wished to withdraw the request. Gstalder stated he would rather have a motion for denial. Stewart made a motion to deny based on his previous findings.