Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 11 17

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes October 20, 2014 Page 8 of 12 Watson stated historic preservation is focused on the preservation of the outside of the building and the City has spent a great deal of money to preserve the outside of the structure. He stated he knows there are additional procedures that can be used to stop moisture while preserving the historical siding. He believes removing the siding and replacing with new siding defeats the purpose of preservation. Fasick stated the recommendation from staff was to approve the siding replacement while documenting the removal of the historic siding. She believed this step does uphold what preservationists ask for in preserving structures. She stated if the replacement of the siding further preserves the structure she is in favor of the project, as long as it is replaced to match. Echohawk asked if the siding was caulked and repainted, how long would it last. Watson stated we don't have the technical expertise here tonight to be able to answer that question, as well as other options. He added that also might be cost prohibitive, which is something else we need to consider. Echohawk stated she was pleased to hear of some of the interior improvements that are being done Watson reminded the board there is more than likely lead in the paint on the siding and you can't just reuse the siding in other areas. Fahey stated she is torn on the project and believes there isn't enough information to proceed with this request due to the lack of an expert. She added new wood would make the structure look smooth and new, but it wouldn't be real. She stated she wouldn't be comfortable voting because there isn't enough information. Haley stated she is torn as well and doesn't know how the project can proceed without additional information. She asked if the painted wall sign would be reinstated. Trice stated yes, they would have to repaint the sign. Watson asked staff to comment on any codes that need to be upheld on the preservation of the siding. Robinson stated the board is bound to the alteration certificate criteria established in the LMC. He stated the exterior is the focus of the guidelines, not the interior. He added a consideration should be given to the long term preservation of the structure. Stewart stated the applicant commented on the need to paint the siding every year, which is untrue. He stated there are studies that show an older siding holds paint better than new siding. He would hope an engineer and an architect would look at other options, such as a rain screen. Stewart asked what the process is if the application is denied. Robinson stated they can appeal to Council.