My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 11 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 11 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:36 PM
Creation date
11/19/2014 8:22:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 11 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 3, 2014 <br />Page 9 of 18 <br />taking a great risk moving forward with application. He referred to the geotechnical <br />reports, but stated he could not provide any level of confidence at this time. <br />Council member Keany asked if there is a warranty on the improvements in the event of <br />subsidence. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ explained it could be stipulated <br />in the development agreement, but two years is typically the warranty on public <br />improvements. <br />Council member Keany asked if there was not a linear park, what would be the <br />requirement for a sidewalk. Planning and Building Safety Director Russ stated it would <br />either be a four foot detached sidewalk or a five foot attached sidewalk. <br />Council member Keany inquired whether there was any way to address HFAB's <br />concern over the City maintaining the intensive landscaping in two years. Planning and <br />Building Safety Director Russ explained there are a number of stages; the approved <br />PUD, the Subdivision Agreement and construction plans for public improvements. The <br />construction plans would be approved by the Parks and Recreation and the Public <br />Works Department. He stated there is time and opportunity to fine tune the landscape <br />plan prior to issuing a building permit. <br />Mayor Muckle liked the public land dedication, the interpretive park and the monument. <br />He felt the trail is an excellent addition to the neighborhood. He did not agree this would <br />be a private neighborhood park. He supported the public improvement and dedication. <br />He requested a warranty before taking over possession of the park. <br />Mr. Phillips addressed the warranty and explained the most current mitigation occurred <br />in 1998 when the mine was grouted and backfilled. What the developer is required to <br />do is to re- mitigate the mine shaft by re- grouting and backfilling the mine shaft. They <br />will also recap the shaft at a lower grade so it will be covered. <br />Council member Stolzmann inquired whether the alley will be publicly or privately <br />maintained. Mr. Phillips explained the Home Owners Association (HOA) would maintain <br />the alley and noted it is also an access easement for the Mayhoffer Ditch, which will be <br />covered. The HOA will also maintain snow removal on the access easement and the <br />sidewalks. <br />Council member Keany supported the proposal and moving forward. <br />Council member Lipton supported the proposal, but not the appraisal. He noted the staff <br />report indicates if Council believes the property values have increased since the 2013 <br />appraisal staff recommends the City Council require an updated appraisal. He <br />supported an updated appraisal and revising the policy at a later time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.