My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2003 01 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2003 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2003 01 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:42 PM
Creation date
9/29/2003 1:48:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/7/2003
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2003 01 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />January 7, 2003 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Light stated the current conservation easement prohibits the conveyance of right-of-ways <br />of new roadways. It would not affect the eventual straightening of Dillon Road or <br />granting temporary construction easements. However, an amendment would be required <br />by the City and County to permit any other new right-of-ways or road construction. <br /> <br />Sisk suggested considering as many options as possible and not involving GOCO in the <br />roadway expansion. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that the South Sub Committee has discussed this matter and noted the <br />redevelopment of the STK property will allow better access for Monarch High School. <br /> <br />Brown asked City Attorney Light if there are options for flexibility. Light stated the issue <br />would have to be raised with the County to amend the existing document, and with <br />GOCO to request some flexibility. <br /> <br />Mayer voiced his concern over bisecting open space with a roadway and that the GOCO <br />grant might be at risk. <br /> <br />Simmons explained the Warembourg parcel included a farmhouse and was complicated <br />with a third party conservation easement that would require amendment for GOCO <br />participation. <br /> <br />Keany suggested asking GOCO to consider moving the conservation easement from the <br />Bowes property to the Admore property. He stated that would preserve the potential for a <br />future access, if needed. <br /> <br />Light stated the Admore property consists of two parcels, which would require separate <br />transactions. He noted one portion of the Admore property was not subject to any <br />conservation easements. <br /> <br />Keany stated he was not prepared to move forward with Resolution No. 1, Series 2003. <br /> <br />Van Pelt suggested discussing the options with GOCO. <br /> <br />Brown noted there are also concerns with expansion of 96th Street, on the east side of the <br />Admore property. <br /> <br />MOTION: Davidson moved that Resolution No. 1, Series 2003 be tabled until the next <br />Council meeting, seconded by Sisk. All in favor. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2, SERIES 2003 - A RESOLUTION FINDING <br />SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE FOR AN ANNEXATION PETITION FILED <br />WITH THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE, COLORADO KNOWN AS THE RAY <br />ANNEXATION, AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.