My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 11 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 11 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:36 PM
Creation date
12/3/2014 7:23:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 11 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 18, 2014 <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />• Option C1 — A simpler, cleaner version of Option C. <br />• Option D — A variation of Option C with a more contemporary feel. Corten Steel <br />Bridge Rail w /Bicycle Rail on Top, Field Stone Multi- Colored Stained Formliner. <br />Public Works Director Kowar asked Ms. Meier to address the red color guard railing. <br />Ms. Meier explained it is a rust color and would not require frequent maintenance. The <br />color lends itself to natural color in rural areas. <br />COUNCIL QUESTIONS <br />Council member Loo inquired whether this red is the same color on the new McCaslin <br />Underpass. Council member Keany explained Corten steel is the same rust color used <br />in the Xcel Power poles. Ms. Meier stated Corten steel is often used for pre- fabricated <br />pedestrian bridges because it does not require a lot of maintenance. <br />Council member Stolzmann addressed the time schedule and stated her interest is in <br />getting the bridge done correctly, but as quickly as possible. She requested a staff <br />explanation of the schedule from January to August. <br />Public Works Director Kowar explained in January they plan for the approval of the 30% <br />completion. He explained it is a long schedule because the design team must complete <br />30 %, 60 %, 90% and to 100% plans with CDOT approval levels along the way. If this <br />was a design and build process there would be a much faster timeline. Unfortunately <br />through the CDOT process there is a lot of time added to ensure there is federal funding <br />and built to the standards CDOT will approve to continue to maintain the roadway in the <br />future. Staff has talked with CDOT and once Louisville has determined what bridge <br />they want, there can be discussions on how to expedite their normal review processes. <br />Staff is waiting for Council approval. <br />Council member Stolzmann summarized this is a bad scenario, but hopefully the City <br />will be able, with their partners, to make the process better. Public Works Director <br />Kowar suggested rephrasing that this is the best scenario with the current information. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ provided a description from a planning <br />perspective and the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Department feels this is the <br />best entry into the City or any City in the County. It is the first chance to break away <br />from suburban Denver, via the Northwest Parkway, into a rural area. From 95th Street <br />you have the same views that Boulder has; you then drop down into a wooded area, <br />Coal Creek, the Farm and Old Town Louisville. He stated the bridge is key to this entry. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Alex Gorsevski, 711 Pine Needle Lane, Louisville, CO favored the Option C -1 design <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.