My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1990 02 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1990 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1990 02 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:31 PM
Creation date
2/18/2008 1:10:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/20/1990
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1990 02 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
developing a dependable water system. This <br />would be used as a back up water system only. <br />We would make sure that the water line would <br />be put in to comply with city standards. We <br />do request that the city charge us the in <br />city rate for water tap and water supply. <br />Howard stated even though there exists 14 <br />homes there is no guarantee that you will not <br />grow. <br />Burroughs stated that Grace Mar Subdivision <br />has an agreement with the State of Colorado <br />that we are only licensed to have 14 taps in <br />our water district, so we can't have more <br />homes. <br />Phare stated the request is for a 1" water <br />tap. It would be tapped off a 6" main and <br />then it would be feed into their existing <br />tank. There would be one meter at the end of <br />the main extension that would flow into their <br />tank. <br />Davidson asked what would happen if the well <br />went permanently dry. Would we be obligated <br />to provide them with water through this 1" <br />line? <br />Phare replies yes, if we sell them a 1" tap <br />regardless of the rate we are obligated to <br />service them. The usage will be read on a <br />monthly basis. <br />Howard said he does not have a problem with <br />the concept of being a good neighbor, the <br />concept between being a good neighbor at the <br />expense of the city is a problem. If I were <br />to agree to this at all they would have to be <br />charged the out of city rate. <br />Mayor Fauson stated he would have to look at <br />the fact that they would not be using this <br />all year, but a few months out of the year. <br />Hornbostel asked if the city would have any <br />control over their water quality? <br />Phare stated the concept would be to separate <br />their water supply from ours. We would be <br />responsible once it goes into a tank, from <br />there they would pump it out to their system. <br />There would be a back flow device on the <br />system, this would help their water from <br />getting into our system. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.