City Council Minutes 1995 07 06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Davidson stated that the only way the developer got this property annexed to the City was by promising that he would build a series of mixed sized homes. He was not in favor of the 12' setback. Mayer stated that he could support condition No. 2, 12' setback, if the further condition that the homes be single story were added. Howard agreed with Lathrop. He did not agree with the narrow setback. Lathrop wanted to know, if this were delayed to a future Council meeting, would it prevent anyone from living in or taking occupancy of their dwelling. Wood stated that it would not. Lathrop moved that Council continue Resolution No. 37 to the next Council meeting on July 18, 1995, with the condition that Council be provided with a plot plan that would show which houses would be affected by a 12' setback and single story structure, as a modification to the PUD. Seconded by Mayer. Davidson also wanted to know the impact on the sizes of the homes that could be built. Howard wanted to look at a 16.9' setback as well. All in favor. RESOLUTION NO. 30, SERIES 1995 - OVERALL, FINAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT AND FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN - CENTENNIAL VALLEY, PARCEL "H" Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that this plat had been revised into a seven lot configuration with two drainage detention tracts. Lots 1 and 2 will likely be replatted upon PUD submittal for individual pad users. The plat dedicated additional right-of-way from McCaslin Boulevard in the form of Tract A and for the Dahlia Street extension south of Dillon Road. The primary change in the revised subdivision plat was the lot line adjustment between Lots 4 and 5 resulting in an area increase for Lot 4 and an area decrease for Lot 5. There was an increase in off-site landscaping, deciduous trees are 2 1/2" caliper and have been increased from 55 trees to 63. Evergreens were increased by one to 54. The revised PUD requested authorization to credit Lot 1, in terms of landscaping and setbacks, with the area in Tract C. The PUD is requesting that future developers in Lot 1 be able to credit the area of Tract C to the development in Lot 1, which is 3.15 acres or 137,000 s.f. Staff did not feel there should be preauthorized relief on the top for development pad on Lots 1 and 2. The roof color combinations can be dealt with at the time of the individual PUD approvals. Resolution No. 30 had six conditions of approval. Wood asked Tom Phare, Public Works Director, to address conditions No. 3 and 4. 7