My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 03 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2015 03 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:18 PM
Creation date
3/27/2015 10:02:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2015 03 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 9, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />Trice stated we have a pretty strong connection with the Cultural Arts Master Plan. <br />Haley stated it would be good if each board member took on an additional board. <br />Stewart believed it is a good idea and stated this is something we used to do, such as <br />with the LRC. <br />Haley stated having one person as contact is a good idea. <br />Jean Morgan stated John Leary mentioned it would be a good idea to have an <br />additional sign along with the City created landmark sign. <br />Trice stated she will check with the vendor who does our plaque signs and will check to <br />see if there is a resident discount. <br />HPF Loan Program <br />Trice introduced the item and presented the information from the packet which included <br />the background to the creation of the HPF and a future loan program. She stated <br />Koertje has been working on this and would like another volunteer to assist with him. <br />She added it can either become as part of the master plan or can be worked on <br />independently. <br />Stewart asked what this has to do with the master plan. <br />Trice stated it can be a component or it can be taken out and worked on as part of a <br />subcommittee. <br />Stewart stated this has already been taken through City Council and they approved the <br />process. <br />Trice stated this is more for establishing the process. <br />Koertje agreed. <br />Trice asked for another volunteer. <br />Watson asked Koertje what he was looking for. <br />Koertje stated it is more about background research for the creation of an RFP. <br />Meeting Dates /Locations Clarification <br />Koertje asked what time the study session started. <br />Trice stated 7 pm. <br />Stewart stated he did not see anything for Preservation Month for recognition of <br />landmarks throughout the City. He also stated they used to have an outreach <br />subcommittee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.