My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2008 01 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2008 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2008 01 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:22 PM
Creation date
4/7/2008 2:44:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2008 01 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 16, 2008 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br /> <br />Lewis stated that the house is small when compared to the whole corner, so saving only <br />the fayade would not be unreasonable. <br /> <br />Lewis thanked Muller and Hartronft for their willingness to work with the HPC. <br /> <br />Muth asked the applicant how they want to proceed. <br /> <br />Muller said that when they have more definite plans, they will come back to the HPC. <br /> <br />Lewis encouraged the applicant to landmark the properties. <br /> <br />Muller asked if there would be any financial incentives for doing so. <br /> <br /> <br />tion of <br /> <br />Koertje informed the applicant of the 20% state tax credit availa <br />land marked properties. <br /> <br />Muckle noted that the HPC can encourage the City Council to h <br />needed. <br /> <br />sign code relief if <br /> <br />Lewis encouraged the applicant to contact the HPC is th <br />where the HPC might be able to help explain the issues to <br /> <br /> <br />come up against any issues <br />e City Council. <br /> <br />Barb Hesson, 411 County Road, asked if p <br /> <br /> <br />do Community Revitalization Association <br />ideas or marketing. <br /> <br />Koertje told the applicant to contact the <br />(CCRA) as they may be able to help with <br /> <br />g will be required for the redevelopment. <br /> <br />Muth informed her that yes; it will <br />guidelines. However, she not <br />is under their purview. <br /> <br /> <br />required consistent with the downtown design <br />ill be addressed by the Planning Commission as it <br /> <br />DiscussionlDire Preservation Ordinance Amendment Regarding Demolition <br />Review Process <br /> <br /> <br />Bonnie McCormick, 1 1 Lincoln Avenue, thanked the applicant for his interest in <br />downtown. <br /> <br />. ed that this item has been placed on the agenda at the request of staff. As <br />eviewed demolition requests over the last three years it has become <br />that the ordinance as written limits HPC discussion of demolition reviews. The <br />ordinan e requires applicants to formally pull a demolition permit to have any discussion <br />with the HPC about the possible historic nature of a site. <br /> <br /> <br />As such, staff would like to start work to bring an ordinance amendment to the City <br />Council for their consideration that would allow for the following: <br />. HPC review of demolition requests without a formal permit but at the request of <br />the building owner; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.