My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 01 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 01 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
7/30/2004 9:17:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/19/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 01 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayer: <br /> <br />the Lastokas, the County, and <br />Lafayette. <br /> <br />Not only do I think our prospects in <br />engaging in that activity have an <br />incredibly small prospect of <br />yielding anything, they could yield <br />financial damages to the City. As <br />public servants who are sworn to <br />uphold the law, to go in public and <br />say that we're going to encourage <br />people to break a contract. We're <br />going to violate an agreement. In <br />order to do this, probably go <br />against the wishes of the last <br />public vote on this issue. It <br />really doesn't make any sense to me. <br />Our chances of succeeding here are <br />minuscule. The chances for damages <br />are not insignificant. The <br />additional cost to Boulder County <br />and Lafayette would be $75,000.00 a <br />piece. I'm sure Lafayette's <br />position would be, "in for a dime, <br />in for eleven cents." For <br />$150,000.00 we get an awful lot of <br />benefit. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Hedding: <br /> <br />The only way I would want to be a <br />part of any City purchase would be <br />where Boulder County, which is a <br />signatory to the agreement, would <br />assign that agreement to us. Not <br />that we would get into a bidding war <br />with the Lastokas, because we have a <br />contract agreement with the Lastokas <br />by way of Boulder County. I think <br />we're really welcoming trouble, if <br />we try to undermine that and I don't <br />want to be a party to that. <br />Citizens have told us that they want <br />open space. My vision is that 25 <br />years from now my children will have <br />that as an open space for them. I <br />don't want to see the corner of <br />South Boulder Road and Hwy. 42 <br />become a four-way maize of <br />commercial buildings. <br /> <br />While I agree with the sentiments <br />and comments of Councilmen Lathrop <br />and Howard, I think that the horse <br /> <br />2O <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.