My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 01 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 01 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
7/30/2004 9:17:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/19/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 01 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the property for the same terms and conditions that is currently <br />being offered by Boulder County in concert with the City of <br />Lafayette. <br /> <br />Davidson inquired if that would be an offer requesting that the <br />County rescind their agreement or is it just an offer directly to <br />the Lastokas? <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />Which ever way will provide success. <br />If the County would be willing to <br />assign their agreement to us, that <br />would be most acceptable. If the <br />County would withdraw their offer <br />and that would be acceptable to the <br />Lastokas, we could then make an <br />offer on the same terms and <br />conditions, that would certainly be <br />acceptable. Or, some combination <br />thereof. I'm suggesting that we at <br />least make an attempt to get that <br />done in our own ownership. <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />I have a real problem in asking <br />parties to rescind agreements on <br />which signatures have been made. I <br />was prepared to suggest, as a caveat <br />to the motion, that Louisville <br />discuss with the County if they <br />would be iwilling to assign the <br />contract to the City of Louisville. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />I want to second what Chuck said. I <br />wouldn't mind supporting the <br />amendment, if they wanted to assign <br />the contract to us and we wanted to <br />negotiate that. That could be <br />something we could explore. <br /> <br />Lathrop: <br /> <br />I am not inferring that we do <br />anything illegal. The real estate <br />market is no different than the <br />securities market or bartering at <br />the flea market. You do things in <br />"good faith". I'm suggesting that <br />we try to buy that property in "good <br />faith", legally. If the quickest <br />way to do it is an assignment of the <br />contract, I'm all for it. If we can <br />do it, is this Council willing to do <br />it? <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.