Laserfiche WebLink
Prouty: <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />Prouty: <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />It's a two (2) acre site (87,000 sq. <br />ft.) <br /> <br />I prefer Plan A, but I'm still very <br />concerned about the density issue. <br />I think we've got one unit too much <br />given the zoning. I want you to <br />stick to the zoning. I'm not going <br />to vote for the plan unless it goes <br />to six (6) units and I'll vote for <br />Plan A, if it is at six (6) units. <br /> <br />We're not dealing with a typical, <br />totally rational zoning situation. <br />This situation is the result of the <br />consequence of decisions that were <br />made prior to a master plan. To the <br />east in old town Louisville you have <br />7,000 sq. ft. lots and to the south <br />are 5,000 sq. ft. lots. We feel <br />that with the combination of a very <br />difficult site and the zoning <br />context it supports our plans <br />appropriateness. That coupled with <br />the purpose of the PUD, which is to <br />try to enable a developer to do <br />something creative, and I might add <br />costly, particularly on a small site <br />is where we're coming from. <br /> <br />Tom (Phare), are we satisfied that <br />if we went with this private drive <br />that it would be something that <br />would be workable given the <br />ordinances of the City? Do we have <br />problems with Plan A? <br /> <br />Phare: <br /> <br />The Public Works Department has not <br />endorsed any projects since Coal <br />Creek Ranch I. We are not going to <br />be responsible for maintaining or <br />dealing with the parking issues on <br />the private street/alley. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />What's the minimum lot size, of the <br />seven (7) lots and the building <br />coverage? I understand a PUD, in <br />order to allow the builder to be <br />creative, one sometimes doesn't <br />enforce the zoning strictly. I do <br />take exception when one drops down <br />say two (2) levels in zoning, <br /> <br /> <br />