City Council Minutes 1993 03 02 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

addressed in the documents. Those aren't addressed in any of the documents, as of yet. Griffiths provided to the City Attorney of Lafayette and the Boulder County Attorney, who are working on the documents, her understanding of the six (6) matters that were identified by Louisville's City Council at its last meeting. Those six (6) issues were: 1.) Addressing drainage 2.) Louisville purchasing the south portion of the property with restrictions prohibiting commercial and residential type development, but allowing Louisville to otherwise determine the use of the property. 3.) Stating that nothing in the agreement or purchase would limit the City's ability to expand its existing shops and Treatment Plant within the south portion purchased by Louisville. 4.) Discussion of the sludge issue with Lafayette to determine if some compromise is possible, so long as the use does not adversely affect the surrounding property in considering a joint project for community composting. 5.) Addressing the price of the south portion of the property, since it is the less valuable portion of the property. 6.) Acquisition by the County of other property of benefit to Louisville. She stated that the other issues that are not addressed in the IGA, as of yet, but were addressed at the February 2, 1993 meeting were: Public access to the property; responsibility for management of the area by the primary user; some method for resolving differences among the parties, in a manner set out in the Louisville/Superior Agreement; addressing liability and insurance issues; addressing ownership issues (joint or divided); specifying limitations on development; provisions superseding the existing 1984 agreement; methods of handling oil and gas leases, drainage issues; clear authority for Louisville to annex the ball field area, identifying what uses would be permitted with the ball fields, i.e., concession stands, parking, lights, etc. Griffiths stated that the draft documents are very preliminary. She commented that, if the substantive issues that Council has identified at the last Council meeting are agreed upon by the other parties in some substantial fashion, then Council will see a substantial revision of all of the documents. The next meeting reviewing the draft documents and consider the substantive issues is set for March 8, 1993. Howard didn't hear mentioned the area where Lafayette was going to have an equal ability to build their own ball fields on some portion of that property, even though they are not going to be fronting their monies for the purchase of the property up front 8