My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 05 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 05 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:36 PM
Creation date
8/18/2004 11:24:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/18/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 05 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR BUSINESS <br /> <br />PRESENTATION OF 1992 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF <br />1992 AUDIT - KIM HIGGINS, BONDI & CO. <br /> <br />Kim Higgins, partner in charge of Louisville's engagement with <br />Bondi & Company, gave a overview of Louisville's financial <br />statements (SEE ATTACHED). <br /> <br />Sisk wondered if Louisville had always received a clean audit, as <br />was the case this year. <br /> <br />Higgins: <br /> <br />When we first started doing the <br />audit, Louisville had a qualified <br />opinion on fixed assets, which meant <br />that we could not determine the <br />validity of the dollar amount in the <br />fixed asset section. That happens a <br />lot with governmental entities, <br />because depending on how old the <br />city is and how far back the <br />documentation goes, it may or may <br />not exist. We recommended that you <br />go through a process where you <br />research your land, and research <br />everything that you had, document an <br />estimated value of that information <br />to come up with a dollar value. If <br />we could audit that information and <br />place validity on those numbers, <br />then we took the qualifier out. At <br />the beginning, when we first started <br />doing our audit, I'm pretty sure <br />that was the case. <br /> <br />Lathrop wondered at what point the City could eliminate the <br />contingent liability for the Two Forks Project, or can they? <br /> <br />Higgins: <br /> <br />What you decided to do last year was <br />to wipe that investment in Two Forks <br />off your books over a three year <br />period. This is the second year. <br />Next year all of it will be gone and <br />eliminated from the financial <br />records. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Higgins: <br /> <br />Would you say that the City's <br />general financial condition is <br />improving? <br /> <br />Most definitely. Your cash and <br />investments are ten times greater <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.