City Council Minutes 1993 07 06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Sisk favored the license agreement, but would not favor the vacation of the property. Lathrop wanted it made clear in the license agreement that under certain circumstances the fences may be requested to be moved at some future date. Osgood felt that all of the neighbors understood that. Lathrop wondered if the City had enough area to put up their signage. Phare: For any of the traffic signs that I ever envisioned being in that right- of-way, yes, that is sufficient. Jason Albright, 923 West Yale Court, Louisville, Colorado, didn't understand the easement from Fireside to Cherry Street, as to why it's as wide as it is and why is the other section narrower. Phare: It's that way, because it is a narrower collector. It's a change in our standard for collectors. We have two different right-of-way widths. The wider one was chosen, because of the school parking, which applied to one side and the bus co- op area was all accommodated within the right-of-way. Some of the problem here is that in building the road the developers didn't set it right for putting that extra right- of-way in the area, where we thought it was going to be placed. Therefore, some of the yards may be further from the back of lot than originally envisioned, because the misalignment of the roadway. Albright: The houses next to mine, as well, are so close to the sidewalk already that putting the fence about 10 ft. down from the sidewalk is almost splitting the yard. I'm in favor of the 4 1/2 ft. Sisk: Would it be appropriate to include Mr. Albright's property in the motion that I'm prepared to make? Phare: Do you live west of the power lines? 11