My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1993 12 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1993 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1993 12 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:37 PM
Creation date
8/27/2004 1:23:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/1/1993
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1993 12 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bill Frazier, 1122 West Enclave, Louisville, Colorado, concurred <br />with Bill Boulet's comments. He was concerned about bicycle safety <br />along McCaslin and in the entire area in general. He was concerned <br />about the lighting, traffic flow, the expanse of the parking lot, <br />and! the building elevations. <br /> <br />Betty Solek, 725 Lincoln Avenue, Louisville, Colorado, read her <br />letter of concern that she had sent to Council (SEE ATTACHED). <br /> <br />Rex Renfrew, 172 Cherrywood Lane, Louisville, Colorado, was <br />representing himself, as a resident, and the Cherrywood II <br />Homeowner's Association. He generally agreed with the previous <br />co~ents. He felt that the perimeter completion of access and <br />landscaping was very important and should be completed at the onset <br />for appearance as you drive down McCaslin. <br /> <br />Davidson called for anyone else in the audience wishing to speak on <br />Res~olution No. 47. <br /> <br />NONE <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council questions. <br /> <br />Mayer wanted the problem of applying the Centennial Design <br />guidelines to this project addressed. <br /> <br />Shonkwiler: <br /> <br />The Gateway standards weren't <br />written from our standards. We gave <br />those standards to the city and they <br />wrote the Gateway standards from our <br />standards, using our exhibits, our <br />language, our words. We intend to <br />meet those standards and, in fact, <br />this project does. <br /> <br />Mayer was concerned about the 35' lighting. <br /> <br />Shonkwiler explained that the three large anchors, Lots 1, 2, and <br />3, are special cases because they are such large users, are <br />receiving scrutinous review, and will be pre-approved by Council. <br />He explained that the six perimeter lots are covered by the design <br />st&ndards, which limit lighting to 30'. Those are the lots that <br />are closest to the roadways. With lower lighting, the trees grow <br />so tall that they get in the way of the lower lighting, which is <br />unsafe. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Open space is mentioned at 17% for <br />this particular parcel. The <br />guidelines that would govern the <br />whole parcel from the Gateway <br />standards are 25%. Do you feel that <br />would present a problem? <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.