My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008 Employee Survey Results
PORTAL
>
CITIZEN and EMPLOYEE SURVEYS (40.340A)
>
2008 Employee Survey Results
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 2:31:49 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 10:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Doc Type
Survey Compilations
Signed Date
7/1/2008
Parties Involved
National Research Center Inc
Record Series Code
40.340A
Record Series Name
Surveys Conducted by City
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Louisville Employee Survey <br /> July 2008 <br /> Employee Evaluation <br /> Four items made up the "employee evaluation" aspect of the employee experience. On average, the <br /> rating for this dimension was 37 points,just above"somewhat" disagree and the lowest rated of the <br /> 12 factors. <br /> The item receiving the highest evaluation was "the existing employee evaluation system is an <br /> effective tool for evaluating my performance,"with half agreeing with this statement. More than half <br /> of City employees disagreed with the other three statements about the existing employee evaluation <br /> system; 3 in 10 or more of respondents "strongly" disagreed. <br /> Figure 12: Employee Evaluation <br /> Disagree •Agree <br /> VA <br /> The existing employee evaluation system is an , . <br /> effective tool for evaluating my performance // ,r <br /> The existing employee evaluation system effectively 41 O <br /> links my pay to my performance/it <br /> The existing employee evaluation system effectively rff,AVA, r <br /> deals with low performing employees �! s,' 35 to <br /> The existing employee evaluation system effectively 9 / <br /> rewards high performing employees ; <br /> -100% -50% 0% 50% 100% <br /> Percent of respondents <br /> U <br /> C <br /> C <br /> U U <br /> U <br /> ct <br /> U <br /> U <br /> r <br /> C <br /> 0 <br /> z <br /> N <br /> DRAFT Report of Results <br /> 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.