Laserfiche WebLink
City of Louisville Employee Survey <br /> July 2008 <br /> CTo facilitate the creation of composite ratings (an average across multiple items), the results for all <br /> agree-disagree type items are reported on a common scale where zero is the worst possible rating <br /> and 100 is the best possible rating. If everyone reported the"strongly agree,"then the result would <br /> be 100 on the 0-100 scale.An average rating of 67 is equivalent to "somewhat agree," 33 to <br /> "somewhat disagree"and zero to "strongly disagree."The 95% confidence interval around a score <br /> on the 0-100 scale based on all respondents typically will be no greater than plus or minus one point <br /> on the 100-point scale. <br /> Calculating the Composite Ratings <br /> The survey contained 88 items that Louisville employees were asked to rate on the previously <br /> mentioned agreement scale. A statistical procedure known as factor analysis was conducted to <br /> identify the underlying question groupings that could be gleaned from the employees'answers on <br /> the survey.This examination identified the individual items (such as "Overall,I am satisfied with my <br /> job,""I have the right skills and abilities for doing this job," etc.) that shared a common theme such <br /> as job satisfaction or employee fit.The factor analysis resulted in 12 main factors,or dimensions, of <br /> employee work experience. More information about this analysis can be found in Appendix C:Survey <br /> Methodology. <br /> These factors or groups of items were used to create composite ratings that measure aspects of <br /> employees'work experience.These composite ratings were calculated as the average of each of the <br /> items included in the factor, converted to the average on a 100-point scale.Thus, the score for each <br /> factor was also on a 100-point scale.There are composite ratings for the following aspects of <br /> employees'work experience: <br /> • Job Satisfaction <br /> • Job Pride and Contentment <br /> • Supervisor Relationship <br /> • Employee Support and Recognition <br /> • Employee Fit and Values <br /> • Employee Workspace and Resources <br /> • Work Group Qmlity and Collaboration <br /> • Department Communications and Policies <br /> • Growth and Training Opportunities <br /> • Employee Evaluation <br /> • Employee Benefits and Programs <br /> • Employer Communication <br /> ci <br /> v I <br /> e. <br /> yW <br /> •a <br /> DRAFT Report of Results <br /> 4 <br />