Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />May 6, 2003 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br />should be broken down in smaller increments. He reviewed the Drought Water Rate <br />Surcharge Plan and stated with Council approval, Staff would amend the Plan to reflect <br />more of a gradual approach to rate disincentives and de-emphasis lump sum charges for <br />exceeding consumption allowances. He noted Louisville resident John Leary submitted <br />an Alternative Drought Plan, which provides a water budget concept to allocate water <br />resources, and transfers between residential accounts. Phare explained the approach is not <br />compatible with the City's utility billing systems. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> <br />Davidson reviewed the comments of the residents, and voiced his opinion that the water <br />rate surcharge should be an incentive to conserve water. <br /> <br />Van Pelt noted the residents were very supportive of water conservation and the <br />surcharge rate. She suggested water conservation measures be added to the plan. She <br />asked Phare to address Mr. Leary's Alternative Drought Plan. <br /> <br />Phare stated the City's utility billing system is not set up for water budgeting and noted <br />the complexity of the plan would require a 1 to 2 year analysis. <br /> <br />There was Council discussion relative to an appeal process. Davidson suggested an <br />administrative appeal process for hardship and for large families. Sisk voiced his concern <br />with the number of exemptions and suggested there should be some criteria. He noted <br />that although only 14 to 16 people attended the meeting, the majority of the residents <br />understand and support the plan. Levihn and Brown agreed that those attending the <br />public meeting were supportive of the management, plan, and that there should be criteria <br />in considering the hardship issues. Levihn commented on a misconception that the City is <br />encouraging the residents to use more water. He voiced his belief the City should <br />encourage water conservation. <br /> <br />Phare reviewed City's management of water during the drought. He noted the Land <br />Management Department is investigating utilizing water through select facilities and <br />targeting at the highest and best use of facilities. He stated that would become a <br />component of the City's Drought Management Plan. He updated Council on the 2003 <br />Water Projections and reported Marshall Lake, Harper Lake and the Louisville Reservoir <br />are all full and Windy Gap has been pumping water into the system. He stated Staff <br />attended the Northern District meeting and received word that the higher snowmelt has <br />not yet occurred. He stressed there is still a lot of moisture in the mountains, and the <br />peak runoff also has not occurred. He stated the City is meeting its daily demand through <br />the stream rights and the stored water has not been used. He estimated the City would <br />operate on stream rights until the middle or June. Staff will continue to keep Council <br />informed on the City's water supply. <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br /> <br />