Laserfiche WebLink
adequacy of the Dahlia access. He felt the parking lot looked like a "sea of asphalt," which he felt <br />should be broken up with median breaks, trees, or foliage. <br /> <br />Lathrop agreed with the previous comments. He stated that the visual representation they bring to <br />Council will be most useful. <br /> <br />Howard felt it was time for Council to think about taking over the maintenance of the off-ramp of <br />the interchange, so there would be visual continuity. <br /> <br />Davidson wanted staff to look into an easement for a water pipe, if that property were going to be <br />irrigated. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council forward the Preliminary Plat and PUD for Parcel H on to the Planning <br />Commission with Council comments. Seconded by Howard. All in favor with Sisk being absent. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 46, SERIES 1994 - FINAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT OF LOT 2 COAL <br />TRAIN SQUARE <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that the purpose of this replat is to vacate the 24' wide access <br />easement and rededicate and merge the utility and access easement together to be a 33' wide easement <br />to improve the internal circulation between Lot 1 (Norwest Bank), the existing Diamond Shamrock, <br />and Lot 3 (proposed office/retail). <br /> <br />Eric Hartronfi, Hartronfi Associates, 1021 South Boulder Road, Louisville, Colorado, stated that this <br />is a better alignment for the Norwest Bank's access from their drive-thru lanes and gives better access <br />for future development potential on Lot 3. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council approve Resolution No. 46, Final Subdivision Replat of Lot 2 Coal Train <br />Square Subdivision. Seconded by Howard. Ail in favor with Sisk being absent. <br /> <br />OTHER REGULAR BUSINESS ITEMS ARISING AFTER PREPARATION OF AGENDA <br /> <br />Davidson called for any business items arising after preparation of the Agenda. <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, asked that Coundl reconsider Ordinance No. 1157 with some revised <br />amendments. <br /> <br />Howard moved that Council reconsider Ordinance No. 1157, Series 1994. Seconded by Mayer. All <br />in favor. <br /> <br />Griffiths referred to pages 3 and 4 and the amendments made to paragraph 3C. She stated that the <br />amendment to C3 would not be proper because though C3 refers only to the 3% Use Tax, as it <br />currently applies to commercial uses. The amendments to C3 instead should have been made to the <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />