Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 21, 2016 <br />Page3of7 <br />Stuart did not do a site visit, has no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest <br />for the application. Gorsevski did not do a site visit, has no ex parte communications, and has <br />no conflicts of interest for the application. Ewy did a site visit, has no ex parte communications, <br />and has no conflicts of interest for the application. <br />Meseck stated that for the requested variance to be approved, five (5) of six (6) votes would <br />need to be affirmative. <br />Meseck asked the applicants if they were ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />749 Wildrose Way — Variance Request <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Greg Godec, 749 Wildrose Way, Louisville, CO <br />I am the property owner at 749 Wildrose Way in Louisville. inten ..night is to seek an <br />extension based on new information I received late last week that Sta ommending <br />against this motion. My understanding up to that point was that it was like •e recommended. <br />I have been out of town up until this morning, so I have had no opportunity t. nything <br />besides a preliminary conversation with counsel about my options, and to think .; ,aut how <br />would further strengthen the case that I have for the variance request. <br />Meseck says I will open it up to the Board. If there are any bits of information or evidence that <br />we are hoping to get tonight, we would have 30 days to look for it. There was some discussion <br />about Xcel removing trees at a certain point in time due to interference with power lines. I hope <br />to see if there is written documentation from Xcel to tell us what their requirements are for trees <br />being replanted within the property line. <br />Godec says the information I have from Xcel in regard to that is that no deciduous trees are <br />allowed in the property in the easement. This is a new policy instituted based on fires in the high <br />mountain areas, and it is across the state, not specific to Louisville or Denver. They did give <br />permission for the vi <br />Malmquist says a <br />recommending appr <br />and the structure as it stands. <br />nuance is a good idea si you have been out of town. If Staff is not <br />this will '' •u some to prepare. <br />Motion m <br />19, 2016 m <br />nded by ontinue 749 Wildrose Way to the October <br />by unanimous voice vote. <br />Meseck says emails re <br />item has been continued <br />'Idrose Way will be entered at the next meeting since this <br />meeting. <br />➢ 940 Caledonia St — <br />17.12.050 of the L <br />and maximum floo <br />lance Request — A request for a variance from Section <br />Ile Municipal Code (LMC) for relief from front and rear setback <br />a requirements to allow additions to the existing house. <br />Case #16 -022 -VA — Continued from August 17, 2016 <br />• Applicant & Owner: Gary Doty, 940 Caledonia St <br />• Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Senior Planner <br />Disclosures: <br />Campbell visited 940 Caledonia Street, has no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts <br />of interest for the application. Malmquist visited the property, has no ex parte communications, <br />and has no conflicts of interest for the application. Meseck did not do a site visit, has no ex <br />parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest for the application. Stuart did not do a <br />site visit, has no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of interest for the application. <br />Gorsevski did not do a site visit, has no ex parte communications, and has no conflicts of <br />