My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 02 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 02 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
7/28/2005 11:09:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/4/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 02 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson asked for Council comments. <br /> <br />Mayer: <br /> <br />Briggs: <br /> <br />Mr. Briggs, if we initiated <br />proceedings tonight, how committed <br />would the City be to the process? <br /> <br />The commitment that I need is a <br />policy direction from the Council to <br />pursue the additional levels of <br />security necessary to obtain bond <br />insurance as we discussed. I, <br />frankly, cannot guarantee that I can <br />obtain bond insurance on the basis <br />of those additional levels of <br />security. I would suggest Council <br />authorize me to offer those <br />additional levels of security to one <br />or more bond insurers to determine <br />whether bond insurance is available <br />at a reasonable price, that would <br />accomplish the refunding within the <br />financial parameters that we <br />discussed. At that point, come back <br />and seek a firm commitment, on the <br />part of the City, to proceed with <br />the transaction. That's a long way <br />of saying that there is no <br />commitment to do anything. <br /> <br />Mayer moved that Council direct Mr. Briggs, of Kemper Securities <br />Group, to explore the possibility of the refunding to see if the <br />City could obtain triple "A" insurance for the refunding of the <br />bonds, seconded by Sisk. <br /> <br />Brand explained that the advantages of this are that it would <br />shorten the bond issue by one year and save the City over <br />$800,000.00 in interest, a substantial advantage. <br /> <br />Roll call was taken. <br />voting against. <br /> <br />Motion passed by a 6-1 vote with Davidson <br /> <br />DESIGNATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENT TO RECEIVE FUNDS FROM <br />CO[~TY <br /> <br />Howard commented that Council needs move on with the program, to <br />designate the City of Louisville as the Economic Development Agency <br />to the County and set aside the $52,000.00 to be earmarked for <br />Chamber activities contingent upon the Chamber giving requests for <br />funding in sufficient detail to release the fund on a project by <br />project basis. The Economic Development Committee's goal being to <br />advise staff to look into when the City is at Build-out. What kind <br />of revenue increases do we have to have so the City can survive? <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.