My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 03 14 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2017 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 03 14 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:25 PM
Creation date
3/13/2017 1:50:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2017 03 14 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — LIVABLE WAGE OVERVIEW AND OPTIONS <br />DATE: MARCH 14, 2017 <br />PAGE 5 OF 12 <br />estimated costs. Data used to produce all cost estimates in this Council <br />Communication are based on January 1, 2017 pay and benefits data. These estimates <br />do not include any merit increases since January 1, 2017, future merit increases for <br />2017, or salary survey data typically completed in July for the following year's budget. If <br />City Council chooses any of these options, staff will prepare more precise cost <br />estimates as part of the 2018 budget update process. <br />Option 1: Bring all Non-benefitted/Variable hours employees (less than 30 hours), <br />excluding seasonal employees and summer interns, up to at least $15.67 per hour. <br />Pros: <br />• Brings wages to the SSS level for Boulder County supporting the livable wage <br />concept and its tenants. <br />• Provides a similar pay philosophy to other communities in Boulder County. <br />• Likely to help us compete for employees in Boulder County. <br />• Likely to help increase retention and decrease turn -over. <br />• Could increase employee satisfaction. <br />Cons: <br />• May pay higher wages than market dictates for certain positions. <br />• May be cost prohibitive in future years depending on revenue projections and <br />assumptions. Hard to reduce wages in the future if revenues don't support this as <br />a minimum wage standard for the City of Louisville. <br />• Will create wage compression and equity issues, which employees may perceive <br />as unfair, leading to decreased satisfaction levels. <br />• Possibly could create fairness and equity issues with Full Time employees who <br />might see wages adjusted significantly for PT/Variable staff but not Full Time <br />staff. <br />• Could result in an increase in turnover due to perceptions of being treated <br />"unfairly" by the City. <br />Cost Estimates: <br />• Preliminary cost estimate is an additional $162,613 in wages, and an additional <br />$12,440 for FICA, and an estimated grand total of $175,053 annually in 2018 <br />and subsequent years. <br />Recommendation for Implementation: <br />• Meet with supervisors of affected employees and discuss and present <br />information regarding the City's new pay philosophy and livable wage standard. <br />Ask for their feedback regarding best time to increase wages: <br />o As soon as possible? <br />o After the summer is over as this option does not include seasonals or <br />interns? <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.