My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 03 14 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2017 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 03 14 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:25 PM
Creation date
3/13/2017 1:50:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2017 03 14 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — LIVABLE WAGE OVERVIEW AND OPTIONS <br />DATE: MARCH 14, 2017 <br />PAGE 6 OF 12 <br />o As part of the 2018 budget process <br />o Other ideas? <br />• Provide time for supervisors to gain feedback from their employees to review and <br />present the same information. <br />• Gather details about issues that arose from these discussions and try to work <br />through issues such as compression and unfairness issues to address them in <br />the beginning of the process. <br />• Circle back with supervisors and employees to share solutions for issues brought <br />forward. <br />• Meet with ALL City employees to present information regarding new pay <br />philosophy and livable wage standard for the City. Transparency with pay is one <br />of the tenants of best practices for compensation in an organization. (See <br />Terminology section to review "Levels of Transparency" for compensation). <br />• Determine time frame for implementation based on feedback from supervisors <br />and budgetary considerations. <br />Option 2: Bring City of Louisville Full Time Employees and Benefitted Part -Time <br />Employees (30 - 40 hours per week) up at least the $15.67 hourly wage. <br />Pros: <br />• This option has minimal impacts on the City as there are currently only five (5) <br />employees who are full time or benefitted part-time employees and are making <br />less than $15.67 per hour. Four of those employees are in the Golf Enterprise <br />Fund and one employee is in the General Fund. <br />• This option would have minimal compression issues as the remaining 180 Full <br />Time or Benefitted Part -Time employees are above the $15.67 per hour livable <br />wage standard. <br />Cons: <br />• This option may not address the desire to have more part-time/variable (29 hours <br />or below) employees at a livable wage. <br />• May not address concerns regarding benefit eligibility for those 29 hours or less. <br />• Increasing wages in the Golf Course Enterprise fund without adjusting <br />expectations regarding sustainability would have additional impacts to the <br />budget. <br />• Unfairness or equity issues could arise as five golf course enterprise employees <br />with benefits would be making about $5 - $6 more per hour than the golf course <br />part-time/variable hour employees or seasonal golf course employees. Most of <br />the City's seasonal golf employees are making between $10 — 12 per hour. <br />Policy considerations: <br />• Should the Livable Wage standard not be applied to the Golf Course Enterprise <br />Fund due to budgetary concerns? <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.