My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1992 09 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1992 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1992 09 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:35 PM
Creation date
8/3/2005 8:42:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/15/1992
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1992 09 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Franklin: <br /> <br />We resolved that. The fence will be <br />on his property and that will be <br />away from the sidewalk. <br /> <br />Howard moved that Council approve the request by Mr. Johnson for <br />the exception to the Louisville Design Guidelines policy for a 6 <br />ft. California chain link fence on his property against the City <br />open space. Seconded by Mayer. All in favor except Lathrop. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION - RECODIFICATION PROPOSALS <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, explained that earlier this year <br />Council authorized her to contact the principle code companies <br />providing services in Colorado to provide proposals for recodifying <br />the City's ordinances. The last recodification of the ordinances <br />occurred in the mid 1970's. The four (4) major code companies <br />contacted were, along with the current codifier of the City Code, <br />were Municipal Code, Colorado Code, and Sterling Codifiers. She <br />requested proposals for recodification and supplied the Council <br />with charts that included a summary of the proposals that were <br />received from each one of the code companies. The lowest proposal <br />came from Sterling Codifiers in the amount of $4,850.00. She also <br />provided material to Council of summaries of telephone calls made <br />to cities who use each one of the four (4) code companies, which <br />summarized the comments of each one of those with respect to <br />services that they're receiving from their current codifiers. She <br />stated that she doesn't have any special experience with any of the <br />four (4) companies, but based on the proposals that they have made <br />Sterling Codifiers seemed to stand out in terms of cost and <br />satisfaction by the cities served. Sterling serves a number of <br />municipalities of some size and each of them spoke very highly of <br />Sterling's services. Sterling's cost was about $3,000.00 below the <br />other lowest cost of the codifiers. Each one of the codifiers <br />provides various software packages to make the code compatible with <br />computer equipment and usable for word searches and so forth, which <br />would be very beneficial to the City. She felt that even with the <br />enhanced software program at the cost of $2,000.00, if the City <br />chose to do that, the cost would still be about $1,000.00 below the <br />other code companies. Included within the basic cost was <br />WordPerfect 5.1 and there are some search capabilities in that, <br />which could be used. <br /> <br />John H. Huisjen, Colorado Code Publishing Company, 305 West <br />Magnolia Street, Ft. Collins, CO was curious about what happens in <br />the proposal process. He stated that as far as pricing, most of <br />the codes are bid almost on a per page basis. He felt that if <br />Council looked at the cost of supplementation as to replace the <br />pages over the years, the cost from Sterling Codifiers is $20.00 <br />per page, from the others it's $18.00 per page. If you guessed at <br />the number of pages, they guessed that there would be 419 pages in <br />the Code, it normally turns out that the bid is almost the same as <br />the page rate. Sterling normally out bids CCPC. He stated that <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.