Laserfiche WebLink
NONE <br /> <br />Davidson went on to comments opposed to the subdivision. <br /> <br />Debra Kalish, 477 Fireside, Louisville, CO, had a request from her <br />daughter to ask Council to please save sled hill. Debra Kalish was <br />at the meeting representing the Sierra Club. After meeting with <br />neighbors, the members of the East County Issues Subcommittee of <br />the Sierra Club voted unanimously to support the neighborhood in <br />trying to prevent the development of sled hill. That resolution <br />was taken on to the Executive Committee of the Indian Peaks group <br />of the Sierra Club, which also passed that resolution unanimously. <br />She stated that the position that the Sierra Club has taken is that <br />they oppose the development of this particular piece of property in <br />Louisville and would support looking for other possible means of <br />purchasing or buying the land. She feels that sled hill is an <br />integral part of the community. She understands that there are <br />black foxes that live on the property. <br /> <br />Alexis Bristol, 1416 Fillmore Place, Louisville, CO addressed the <br />issue of existing traffic on existing neighborhood streets. She <br />felt that little thought had been given regarding the cut through <br />traffic on West Willow and West Linden, which she felt could not be <br />ignored. She stated that it would be very difficult to make a left <br />hand turn off of South Boulder Road from Ridgeview Estates, <br />especially during rush hour traffic during the winter months, when <br />the streets are icy and slick. She stated that the access road <br />that gets onto South Boulder Road crosses over open space, which <br />set a very poor precedent to allow a developer to pave open space. <br />Approximately 1,440 additional vehicle trips per day would impact <br />the Hillsborough West Subdivision east of Washington Street. She <br />stated that it will worsen the already dangerous situation at the <br />school crossing on Washington Street. She also addressed concerns <br />about blocking existing homeowner's views. She stated that as <br />existing homeowners, they would lose their rights to the air, <br />light, and view, as stated in the Louisville zoning principles. <br />She wondered, if the new homes east of Fillmore Place would be <br />allowed to erect fences. If so, how far from the existing property <br />lines would the fencing go, how high would they go, and would it be <br />a solid fence. She asked that the letter that the Mayor had <br />mentioned be made a part of the official record. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />Certainly. We'll make that part of <br />the record. <br /> <br />Franklin: <br /> <br />The zoning regulations allow 6 ft. <br />privacy fences in the rear and side <br />yards up to the front yard set <br />backs. In short, the common <br />boundary to the east side of <br />Hillsborough West, the homeowners <br />could apply, as could the old, for 6 <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />