Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />SOLID WASTE SERVICES DISCUSSION <br />APRIL 11, 2017 <br />PAGE 5 OF 6 <br />Solid Waste Fund Fees <br />In the last half of 2016 the City implemented a new chart of accounts to budget by <br />Program and Sub -Program and clarify the City's key operational areas. During this <br />process, departments allocated expenses to various Sub Programs based on estimates <br />from best available information at that time. The allocation of expenses in the City <br />Manager's Office, Information Technology, and Parks and Recreation related to solid <br />waste activities in those areas impacted the historical operating balance of the Fund. <br />Updating the 5 Year Financial Plan for the fund to reflect these increased expenses <br />indicates it is necessary to revise fees to generate adequate fund reserves. <br />On March 31, 2017, the Utility Committee discussed the new expenses and updated <br />fees. The Utility Committee and staff recommend an increase of the existing <br />Administrative Fee for the Single Hauler Residential Program and the addition of a new <br />fee for Yard Waste Services. Based on Utility Committee comments, staff proposes <br />increasing the Single Hauler Residential Administrative Fee from $1.55 per month to <br />$2.35 per month. This fee incorporates overhead that is specific to the Single Family <br />Hauler program for contract management, utility billing, and customer service. These <br />costs are distributed across 5,283 accounts. <br />Based on Utility Committee comments, staff also proposes a new Yard Waste Services <br />fee of $0.25 per month, to fund services related to the ongoing tree branch drop off and <br />leaf pick up programs that are performed by Parks and Recreation and Public Works <br />staff. This fee would be applied to all 8,500 Utility Billing Single Family Equivalent <br />(SFE) accounts. Setting this fee in this manner provides for costs being distributed <br />across all residential customers citywide, instead of just those customers who are in the <br />Residential Single Hauler program. This would include HOA and Multifamily. The <br />methodology proposed is the same as the methodology used for billing the Boulder <br />County Hazardous Materials Management Facility Fee. <br />If the new Yard Waste Services Fee is not implemented it will be necessary to increase <br />the Administrative Fee by $2.75 per month to generate adequate reserves. <br />Pros: <br />The Sub -Program budget more accurately allocated costs based on activities <br />related to the services being provided. <br />The new fees would more accurately reflect cost recovery for services related to <br />refuse, recycling, and compost within the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund. <br />Cons: <br />The Sub -Program budget allocated costs makes it necessary to increase the <br />Solid Waste Administrative Fee and implement a new Yard Waste Services Fee <br />to reflect all costs of service. <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />7 <br />