Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 4, 2017 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />beneficial to the area. He noted both signals are greatly needed to alleviate congestion <br />and to improve safety. The District is committed to fully funding both signals. Substantial <br />growth continues in the CTC, increasing the demand for services in the area $1.2M is a <br />lot of money, but once the signals are completed, the connector may still be needed. It <br />would be a positive to the City. <br />Scott Reichenberg, Colorado Group and CTC Metro District, noted the District only has <br />$800,000. A recent vote of the District members denied a funding change so this is all <br />the money they can commit The developers feel they have been paying impact fees to <br />the City and they thought those would be reinvested in the CTC, not other parts of the <br />City. All of the improvements are needed for the function of the district <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton suggested a short-term rent increase in the CTC could pay for <br />the needed improvements. <br />Councilmember Maloney noted he would like the two signals to be the priority and the <br />connector the third priority. Mr. Vasbinder stated if those two signals bring RTD to the <br />park it would be beneficial and they would likely support that. <br />Public Comments <br />Deb Fahey, 1118 West Enclave Circle, stated a bus in CTC would likely increase <br />business in downtown resulting in an increase to the City's revenue. She stated her <br />support for the transit service. <br />Randy Caranci, 441 Elk Trail Lafayette, stated his support for all three proposed <br />improvements for increased safety and congestion. He felt the connector would be a <br />benefit for the City as a whole. <br />RJ Harrington, 457 East Raintree Court, stated his support for the three projects. <br />Mayor Muckle summarized the Council's support for the two signals to address <br />congestion and safety, and as an economical way to move forward with no other <br />funding currently available. He stated his support for the connector but noted it is not <br />likely to be in the current CIP funding. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — MOBILE HOME PARK POLICY <br />Director Zuccaro stated the City Council included in its 2017 Work Plan a review of <br />Mobile Home Park Zoning regulations with an interest in preserving affordable housing <br />He stated the City Council could consider several options to support or preserve mobile <br />homes as an affordable housing option, including: 1) Maintain current regulations <br />covering mobile homes and the operation of the existing moble home park 2) While <br />maintaining current regulations, the City and/or the Boulder County Housing Authority <br />could enter into an agreement with the park owner to provide incentives and support for <br />the long-term viability of the existing mobile home park 3) Provide support for a <br />Resident Owned Community (4) Adjust existing zoning to create a mobile home only <br />