City Council Minutes 1992 11 04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Hornbostel: care about is the western alignment. Also, when you were talking about the Tabor Amendment, you mean at this time? Howard: Right. At this time. Seconder, Mayer, accepted that. Ail in favor. RESOLUTION NO. 66, SERIES 1992 - RECONSIDERATION OF TOWN HOMES AT CO~ CREEK - FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL PLAT Mark Nuszer, Club Homes Development Corporation, stated that they have substituted a four unit building on building No. 2. Previously, it was five units. He commented that by doing that, they have pulled that building back 20 ft. farther from Dahlia Street. He stated that on building No. 19 they have substituted a four-plex for the five-plex that was originally proposed with a further setback of the building by 20 ft. The entry to the project on the north end of Dahlia has been shifted approximately 30 ft. south. They have increased the size of the open space area to the north of it. Previously, they had two open space areas. They have combined the two to make one large area. They are burming and adding an additional nine Conifer trees to the project. He stated that the end units, in every situation, are one story. The phasing schedule is exactly the same with 113 units vs. 115 units previously. William R. Briggs, 694 Club Circle, Louisville, CO, was requested by some of the residents of Club Homes to make some comments. Briggs bought in this area because their literature stressed low maintenance, easy living. He commented that not too long ago he had some problems with some fencing that had been put in on the model homes. After two or three of the other homes had been put in, they noticed some problems that looked like these fences would end up to be fairly high maintenance items. He stated that in the PUD it described a type of fencing, stucco fencing/concrete masonry, that is very durable and fits in with their literature. Briggs' fencing is a wood base, a plywood structure, covered with stucco. Five of the buyers wrote a letter, which resulted in a meeting with 20 - 30 of the homeowners came. The meeting came to an impasse on the subject, which is why Mr. Briggs came to tonight's Council meeting. He stated that he had just received another letter from Club Homes, which stated that management had consulted with the City of Louisville Planning Department and had decided that it would be best not to install any stucco fences on the perimeter or individual lots, until application for amendment to the original PUD is accepted by the City of Louisville and that the CHDC had decided to pressure treat posts and will examine the additional variations of hard mesh and hard exterior coating on the fences. The letter stated that it expects the amendment process to 17