City Council Minutes 1992 11 04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Hedding: there are many places to store snow that accumulates in a small area. I'm not convinced. I've lived with this situation where I'm live now. It's almost an impossible situation, if the snow gets more than a foot deep. Nuszer: These stubbed out streets are all less than 150 ft., which is the maximum length that the Fire Department allows without a cul-de- sac at the end. Sisk: I talked to Dan Davis and indicated my continued concern about the density of the project. I think building No. 26 destroys the entire integrity of your project. Dan Davis, 440 Owl Place, Louisville, CO, Town Homes at Coal Creek, stated that in the gazebo park area, maybe they can go to a four- plex. He stated that they are at 51% open space right now. Sisk: Given the changes that are being made, don't we have a situation where this going to have to go back to the Planning Commission? Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, stated that she had looked at that question and it's unclear, but the revisions that have been made to the plan is that it is more restrictive on the PUD than originally approved by the Planning Commission, but does not conflict with what the Planning Commission approved. She stated that it may be possible for the Council to go ahead and approve this with additional conditions. She felt that there is some risk of the developers, if the Council doesn't send it back to the Planning Commission. The options of the Council are to approve it, disapprove it, to approve it with conditions, or to send it back to the Planning Commission. Sisk: I'm concerned about jeopardizing the process in terms of public input. Howard: I see there is a member of the Planning Commission here. I know you can't speak for the Planning Commission as a body, but in your opinion, based upon your participation in those Hearings, do these proposed changes conflict with 21