My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 06 24
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2008 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 06 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:36:18 AM
Creation date
9/12/2008 11:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
5F6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2008 06 24
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />June 24, 2008 <br />Page 3 of6 <br /> <br />back from contractors and that Longmont has approved approximately 120 to <br />130 single family home plans and about 30 are green built since implementing <br />the program. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk asked the BCBOA why they were recommending a voluntary <br />program instead of a mandatory program. <br /> <br />Chief Building Official Jones said that the voluntary program was the initial step <br />until the updated IBC and/or ANSI Code comes out. Chief Building Official Jones <br />stated that it is cost prohibitive to update the City's building code every time the <br />I BC/ANSI Code is revised and that the BCBOA in an effort to save money had <br />skipped the 2006 revision cycle. Chief Building Official Jones emphasized that <br />eventually the goal of the BCBOA is to have a mandatory build green program. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk pointed out that if the City waits until the 2009 Code revision cycle <br />that we have then lost 2 years. Mayor Sisk also thought that incentives to exceed <br />the standard should be investigated. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Sheri Marsella inquired about the consortium that is dealing with <br />green build. Chief Building Official Jones said that the consortium is looking at <br />commercial not residential and they are using the LEEDS 2.2 model as a <br />guideline. Chief Building Official Jones said that he thinks the consortium will <br />come up with a plan and then the Cities will make amendments to that plan. Mr. <br />Allison concurred with Chief Building Official Jones assessment. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella asked Mr. Allison what was the cost to the Longmont's <br />Building Department and did they hire additional staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Allison said that they implemented the program with their current budget and <br />did not hire any additional staff. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella pointed out that Louisville's Building Division has a <br />small staff in comparison to Longmont's department and may not be in a position <br />to take an additional program. Chief Building Official Jones pointed out that if <br />they use the HERS model like the City of Boulder where they contract for the <br />HERS inspector that the cost is to the homeowner/builder not the City. <br /> <br />A member of the BCBOA pointed out that this is example of why the Board <br />recommended going to a voluntary program initially, so that a program was in <br />place while they take a closer look at the various programs being used and <br />develop a program that would work in Louisville. He said that the market is <br />shifting and more contractors are building green but the cost of certification may <br />be the tripping point. <br /> <br />Councilor Ron Sackett asked if there is more value in a green built home than in <br />traditional built home. Chief Building Official Jones said that there was because <br />they are generally better built and there is a demand for them in the market. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.