Laserfiche WebLink
Davidson: <br /> <br />Code, by approximately 10% - 12%. <br /> <br />The plan being presented is 12 small <br />buildings into five large buildings <br />and I'm not too sure that lot <br />coverage is much different that <br />Fukai's original proposal. It <br />doesn't come close to meeting my <br />definition of low density. My <br />feeling is that it should not be <br />sent to the Planning Commission. <br />It's not low impact. It's not low <br />density. It doesn't meet any of the <br />criteria that that piece of land <br />would have to meet in order to be <br />annexed. <br /> <br />Brooks: <br /> <br />Sis. k: <br /> <br />I feel that we have exceeded in <br />terms of the amount of landscaping, <br />access, parking, convenience, <br />building height, the requirements <br />set forth by the City of Louisville <br />in the Codes and Ordinances. I <br />don't feel that reducing the density <br />of coverage from 13% down to 8% <br />would make any economic sense <br />considering other development costs, <br />requirements, and reimbursements <br />that the City is liable to put on <br />the project and expect to amortize <br />over the project. I'll carry your <br />message back to the people that <br />we've been dealing with. <br /> <br />I'm concerned about the expanded <br />land use description. I was under <br />the impression that this was going <br />to be proposed as a medical office <br />park, but the expanded land <br />description indicates that there <br />would be some retail outlets. <br /> <br />Brc.oks: <br /> <br />We're not talking about a stand- <br />alone retail shop. We're just <br />saying that we don't want <br />professional people that, as an <br />incidental part of their practice, <br />need to sell things, copies, or <br />provide products in the scope of <br />their professional services, that <br />they should not be restricted from <br />doing that. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />