My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2017 06 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2017 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2017 06 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:11 AM
Creation date
7/20/2017 1:33:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2017 06 08
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Staff Report <br />June 8, 2017 <br />breezeway, building separation, low-pitched roof and simple forms enable the design of <br />the proposed addition to be "differentiated from the old" maintaining the integrity of the <br />historic structure. The Historic Preservation Commission also approved an alteration <br />certificate for this proposed design at their meeting on May 15, 2017. <br />Waivers <br />The applicant requests the following waivers: <br />The requirement in the Old Town Overlay Zoning Regulations that the roof pitch be <br />6:12 or greater. The proposed pool house design shows a low-pitched roof. The <br />purpose of the roof pitch requirement is to limit the bulk of residential buildings <br />within Old Town. Staff finds this design of the pool house is appropriate and further <br />enhances the historic Center for the Arts. Staff supports this waiver request. <br />The Old Town Overlay Zoning Regulations require a 15' street side setback and a <br />25' rear setback. The applicant requests waivers for both of these setbacks based <br />on the existing location of the Center for the Arts and pool house. Staff supports <br />these waiver requests. <br />The CDDSG landscaping requirements include a 10' wide buffer planting strip <br />along the north and west property lines. The existing and proposed pool decks <br />extend to the property line leaving no roof for a landscaping buffer. The proposed <br />design does eliminate any existing landscape buffer. Staff supports this waiver <br />request. <br />The CDDSG requires screening for dumpsters, utility equipment, meters and <br />transformers. The applicant requests a waiver to the requirement to screen the <br />dumpsters currently located within the alley right-of-way. If the dumpsters remain <br />in the current location, the enclosure would be within the right-of-way. Staff does <br />not support this waiver and recommends the relocation and screening of the <br />dumpsters. <br />The applicant requests a waiver to the principal structure separation of 10'. The <br />principal structure separation requirement in residential zone districts is 5'.The <br />proposed design has an 8'8" building separation. Staff finds this waiver request is <br />not necessary. The applicant shall remove this waiver request. <br />Special Review Use <br />Staff Analysis <br />A SRU is intended to allow for land uses that may or may not be appropriate for a zone <br />district depending on the specifics of the proposal. Under Section 17.12.030 of the <br />Louisville Municipal Code, "City, county, state, and federal uses and buildings" are a <br />Special Review Use in all zone districts. Louisville Municipal Code § 17.40.100.A lists <br />five criteria to be considered by the Planning Commission in reviewing a Special Review <br />Use application, which follow. The LMC authorizes Planning Commission to place <br />conditions on a recommendation of approval, if they believe those are necessary to <br />comply with all of the criteria listed below. <br />1. That the proposed use/development is consistent in all respects with the spirit and <br />intent of the comprehensive plan and of this chapter, and that it would not be <br />contrary to the general welfare and economic prosperity of the city or the <br />immediate neighborhood; <br />26 <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.