Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />February 17, 2004 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br /> <br />Deputy City Manager Julie Boyd reviewed the City's 1997 policy that authorizes <br />reimbursement of clean-up costs to residents who have had flooding due to a backup of <br />the sewer main line, when the City is found to have no liability. The policy authorized <br />reimbursement up to $1,000. Property owners must submit bills to the City and sign a <br />release. Recently the City conducted a telephone survey of how other communities <br />handle these types of claims. Based on information received, the Council has indicated a <br />desire to increase the reimbursement amount to a maximum of $2,500. Resolution No. 9, <br />Series 2004, provides for that change, but does not change any other provision of the <br />1997 policy. She noted the Resolution did not include an effective date and <br />recommended December 31, 2003. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk called for public comment. <br /> <br />Louis Breyfogle, 1035 West Willow Street, Louisville, CO addressed sewer backup <br />cleanup issue. He stressed such cleanup is something that should be done by a <br />professional and not the homeowner. He emphasized it is not only a clean-up issue, but a <br />health issue. He voiced his believe the maximum level of reimbursement should be <br />increased and noted that many of the surrounding communities not only pay for the <br />cleanup, but also for repairs, without a cap. He thanked the Council, City Manager and <br />Staff for investigating this matter. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Keany asked for clarification that cleanup does not cover replacement. <br />Deputy City Manager Boyd confirmed the cleanup does not cover replacement of the <br />damages for the finished living area. <br /> <br />Council member Brown asked if it would be covered under the City's liability insurance. <br />Deputy City Manager Boyd stated it is not covered under the City's insurance. City <br />Manager Simmons stated that the City might be held liable. <br /> <br />Council Discussion: Council member Brown addressed the issue that persons are not <br />aware they can insure themselves through their homeowner's insurance policy against <br />cleanup and replacement from sewer backup. Mayor Pro Tem Keany asked if the <br />Resolution could be modified to increase the maximum to $5,000. Council member Van <br />Pelt voiced support for set maximum amount. Mayor Sisk stated that private citizens have <br />an opportunity to purchase an insurance rider that would cover sewer backup cleanup and <br />replacement. He suggested focusing on the $2,500 maximum at this time. Council <br />member Brown commented that most of the municipalities had an unlimited amount. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Keany asked for a provision for an appeal process. Council member <br />Marsella supported the $2,500 maximum. Council member Van Pelt suggested the <br />maximum of $3,000. Sisk suggested the maximum for property damage and cleanup not <br />exceed $3,500.00 <br /> <br /> <br />