City Council Minutes 2004 05 04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting May 4, 2004 Page 5 of 11 RESOLUTION NO. 22, SERIES 2004 - A RESOLUTION DENYING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE AND AMENDED FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 66- UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON LOT 1, CENTENNIAL PAVILION SUBDIVISION (CENTENNIAL PAVILION LOFTS) Mayor Sisk requested a Staff presentation. Council member Brown recused himself from the discussion/vote on Resolution No. 22. City Manager Bill Simmons stated the applicant requested an opportunity to speak. Mayor Sisk requested the applicant presentation. Scott J. Pedersen, Pedersen Development Co., 411 Camino Bosque, Boulder, CO, stated as the developer of the property, he approached the Planning Department Staff, in October of 2003, about the condominium project. The project received a positive response from City Staff. At the Planning Commission level, two public hearings were conducted. The Commission requested the Planning Department Staff review the proposal to determine if it met the five criteria for the Special Review Use and it was the Staff's determination the criteria was met. He expressed his confusion with the Council's decision to deny the proposal. City Attomey Light noted the public hearing was closed at the last Council meeting and the action before the Council is Resolution No. 22, Series 2004. He explained if further testimony were to be taken, the matter must be continued. MOTION: Council member Keany moved to continue the Centennial Lofts Special Review Use matter to June 1, 2004. Council member Marsella seconded the motion. Roll call vote was taken. The motion passed by a vote of 5-1. Mayor Sisk voted no. Brown excused from voting. DISCUSSION/DIRECTION - AMENDMENT TO THE FABER ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (continued from 4/6/04) Mayor Sisk requested a Staff presentation. Planning Director Paul Wood updated Council on the amendment to the Faber Annexation Agreement, which was continued at Mr. Waldman's request. He entered two items into the records; the amendment to the annexation agreement; and a letter from the Leffingwell's. He reviewed Mr. Waldman's request to incorporate language into the amendment: 1) Link the requirements outlined in the Waldman, Barnes, Leffingwell framework agreement document into the Faber Annexation Agreement Amendment. 2) Reduce the area of the proposed conservation easement from 1.6 acres to one acre to provide area to construct a horse stable.