Laserfiche WebLink
6/5/84 Page -13- <br />Biut he assumed that perhaps that would happen <br />in the future, and if Council accepts this <br />request they could be looking at another <br />8•-10 such requests west of 80th St. - south <br />o:E South Boulder Road. <br />Kenneth J. Pliska, Sr. In reply to Councilman Luce's inquiry of <br />1867-B Regal Court why just a water tap was requested and not <br />a sewer tap, Mr. Pliska stated the reason <br />hE~ chose at this time not to request the <br />sE~wer connect is that the sewer line does <br />not run in front or adjacent to the lot, <br />so it would require a 166' of construction <br />on the road at $25.00 per foot plus the <br />addition of a sewer main manhole at $1,200, <br />and because of the additional expense chose <br />to put in a ceptic system. <br />Councilman Luce Inquired if we had any indication whether <br />at: any point and time these general group <br />of` lots intend to be annexed to the City, <br />or• has that ever been a question? <br />Administrator Wurl advised that at one time <br />the City solicited them for annexation, as <br />wee did other enclaves. He advised that we <br />have one application pending which will be <br />brought up at the next Planning Commission <br />meeting; and we had another application <br />which has been temporarily removed, that <br />is within the same area. <br />Annexation In reply to Councilman Luce's question if <br />he planned to apply for annexation in the <br />near future, Mr. Pliska stated he would be <br />very proud to be a part of Louisville proper. <br />The reason that he chose not to request <br />annexation at this time was that he was ad- <br />vised that there would be a 2-3 month delay. <br />If that were not a problem and he could <br />commence building at this time so that he <br />could move his family into a permanent dwelling <br />he would be glad to request annexation. <br />Councilman Leary Stated that Council did set a policy dealing <br />with undeveloped lots in Paradise Acres <br />where we stated that we wouldn't provide <br />services to unbuilt on lots as it was not <br />Council's intent to encourage growth outside <br />ou:r City limits. One of the issues there <br />was that it was not in our service area. <br />His question was - is this lot in our service <br />area? <br />