My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 06 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 06 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:23 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 11:56:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/5/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 06 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6,/5/84 Page -20- <br />the crossing east of the intersection than <br />west of the intersection. The signal must <br />bE~ set back 150' from. the intersection so <br />the children would have to walk across <br />Washington, walk to the west 150', across <br />the street and then back to Washington to <br />continue southward to the school. <br />Councilman Luce inquired - is it anticipated <br />then. that there would be another pedestrian <br />activated crossing light further to the <br />west that would pick up some of the Con- <br />tinental View. subdivision? <br />Mr•. Wurl replied - no, what is anticipated <br />is that they would walk along the north side <br />of the street and cross at this crossing. <br />Sometime in the future signalization would <br />be placed at the intersection of Washington <br />St. <br />Director Kasch stated that according to <br />estimated projected population figures full <br />signalization at Washington St. probably <br />would not be warranted for another 4 years. <br />The reason for the pedestrain signal being <br />placed east of Washington St. was that it <br />was almost dead center between Continental <br />View, Mesa Point, and the future build out <br />at Hunter's Ridge and Ponderosa. At the <br />time that full signalization is made at <br />Washington 5t. the pedestrian crossing would <br />be eliminated and located at a different site <br />where it is needed. <br />Councilwoman Morris Stated that she did not favor the pedestrian <br />signal east of Washington St. She further <br />stated the reality right now is that the <br />children are going to walk directly across <br />South Boulder Road underneath the power lines. <br />Mrs. Morris favored further study on the <br />South Boulder Road pedestrian crossing before <br />calling for bids. She also commented that <br />some people had asked if it would be possible <br />on the corners on Kenneday or Washington St. <br />particularly that on the end of each street <br />on Washington to have the curb angled down <br />fo:r the bicycle traffic so that children <br />wi:11 be encouraged to ride their bikes on <br />the=_ sidewalkss opposed to in the streets. <br />ShE, also suggested crossing guards at the <br />he<~vy crossing times and would like to have <br />this studied. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.