My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 06 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 06 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:23 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 11:56:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/5/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 06 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6/5/84 Page -22- <br />JOE COLACCI - PARKING LOTS Co~ancilmembers had a copy of the leases <br />AUTHORIZE SIGNING OF LEASES and at the request of Councilwoman Morris <br />Planner Lanterman clarified the following <br />items. Rent payments - the consideration <br />is that the City is improving the ground. <br />We are paving it and striping it. There <br />is no money involved, and for this they <br />are offering 5-year leases. Regarding <br />the taxes - once those properties are used <br />by the City with a municipal lease we are <br />exf~mpt from paying taxes on the property. <br />There is a very small parcel in the RR right- <br />of--way on Pine St. It is approximately 9' <br />wide narrowing down to 0 and is 90' long. <br />We are working on a lease agreement with the <br />RR and have received preliminary approval. <br />ThE.re could be some very small fee that <br />thE~y would assess the City to lease this. <br />Councilman Luce Asked what the cost to the City was for <br />thE, paving collectively? <br />Administrator Wurl advised the cost for the <br />tot=al project was $45,000+, for all the sites. <br />Councilman Luce commented so we are paying <br />$9„000 per year to lease some parking lots <br />which at the end of 5 years we have nothing <br />of f_ that investment? <br />Administrator Wurl stated that the Museum <br />parking lot would have to come out of that <br />category because we own that .which would be <br />approximately $10,000. <br />Mr.. Luce asked why there was a limitation <br />of 5 years on the leases? <br />Planner .Lanterman stated that none of the <br />owners were interested in selling the proper- <br />tiE:s and during the negotiations when we <br />ask:ed for 15-20 years they did not want to <br />conunit to that; consequently the 5-year lease <br />agreements were worked out. So it seemed <br />to be a real benefit to get the ball rolling <br />on the downtown project. <br />Councilman Luce concurred with the concept <br />of the parking plan, but did have a problem <br />with investing $45,000 for the short term <br />of 5 years. The property owner has had <br />hi:~ property enhanced - did we try to nego- <br />tiate if they don't. plan wilding on those <br />logs at the end of 5 years? <br />Mr. Lanterman ~ stated that that is in the <br />lease agreements that the lease can be re- <br />newed at that time - can as opposed to would. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.