My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 02 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 02 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:22 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:29:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/7/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 02 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2/'7/84 Page -13- <br />in the best interest of the City. It was <br />hips belief that Council felt they were doing <br />the right thing and he had no problems on <br />that line. He did believe that x~.lanned and <br />restricted gx-owth is vital to the future <br />prosperity of= Louisville and would not <br />suggest this Council take this matter lightly. <br />It was Mr. Rowan' feeling however, that <br />in adhering t:o their anti-growth stance, <br />this City Council has lost sight of its <br />major objective - the betterment of the City <br />of Louisville. In the past few months, a <br />week has not gone by that the City Council <br />has not been written about in the area <br />newspapers. These articles have brought <br />attention to the City but thanks to this <br />Council, Louisville has become a circus for <br />reporters to headline. (No offense to any <br />of the reporters present). Although the <br />City of Louisville has been in the limelight <br />in Boulder County, it is quickly falling be- <br />hind BroomfiE.ld and Lafayette in economic <br />growth and development, which Councilmembers <br />all seem to stand for. He wished to make <br />SUPPORTED HOMART APPLICATION a statement for Homart even though they are <br />in the losers sense of the word - his com- <br />petition - hf~ worked for a developer. He <br />was doing this because he felt that that <br />entrance into Louisville is vital for the <br />development of the rest of Louisville. Hom- <br />art has spent hundreds of thousands of~dollars <br />on plans to bring in residential and com- <br />mercial development. Mr. Rowan stated he <br />could not understand how any member of Council <br />feels they are better qualified to redo or <br />reorganize these plans than any engineer <br />or architect that Homart has employed. They <br />have given open space to the City; they <br />have donated money to downtown Louisville. <br />You speak about the development of downtown, <br />he was aware that Homart had given a grant <br />tai the Louisville Development Corp. He <br />didn't know of anything more that anyone <br />could ask of Homart in trying to work for <br />thus City. This stance of Louisville anti- <br />gY•owth in the papers is not just effecting <br />Homart. If Homart leaves - fine, Louisville <br />will go on; but it is hurting the rest of <br />the City. Other businesses are not actually <br />looking at Louisville when cities such as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.