My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 01 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 01 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:22 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 2:46:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/3/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 01 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1/3,/84 Page -13- <br />Increase in Rates properly informed. regarding the new rates. <br />We are being told that through the FCC that <br />we don't have a great deal of say over the <br />premium rates. Yet there seems to be $14.50 <br />dif:Eerence between Louisville and Lafayette <br />ratE~s. Felt t:hat as a council should re- <br />quest and receive evidence of information <br />of 'the costs ghat are passed on to your fees, <br />and see if a rate increase indeed is in <br />VCR order. Stated that he was still concerned <br />about the VCR the fact that you have to have <br />the remote and can only tune in to one channel. <br />Thought it was a shame to scramble the public <br />domain. Was able to get channels 2, 4, 7, and <br />9 - now they are being scrambled and with the <br />VTR does not have the option to look at the <br />domain and record it as he has in the past. <br />He :requested that they not scramble the public <br />domain - on the premium channels felt this <br />was more approprate since the have the equip- <br />ment to do this without disturbing the other <br />channels. Councilman Cussen also stated that <br />several people are having problems with <br />Channel 4 since the new converter has been <br />installed - picture reception is very poor. <br />Reiterated that the timing on the premium <br />packages was being presented to the people <br />in a cart before the horse fashion, and <br />how will they reach homes where both people <br />work. Several people had stated that they <br />had a problem getting someone on the phone <br />in the office and then didn't get a definite <br />answer. Cussen stated that he had called <br />the local office, Lafayette and Longmont <br />offices and the Ohio office on 2 occasions. <br />Remarked that the sad thing was that the 3 <br />representatives present had to take all the <br />heat when Cleveland, who are the decision <br />makers were not present. Felt that Mr. <br />Romano and Mr. Callaghan should be present <br />and felt that council should direct the <br />Attorney to review the agreement to see that <br />it is not violated and if it is take legal <br />action. <br />Mayor Meier Advised that he would allow one more question <br />of each person and then coucil would proceed. <br />From the Audience A gentleman stated it was his understanding <br />th<~t all cable systems be interactive, with <br />th_Ls new system how would his privacy be pro- <br />tected of his viewing habits, and what assur- <br />ance could bey given. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.