City Council Minutes 1984 11 07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

11/7/84 Page -5- Councilwoman Johnson Referred to page 5 - section 11) e. of the Low Intensity Recreation agreement as well as section 6) and inquired what was considered low intensity recreation? Mr. Acimovic advised that section 6) speci- fically spoke to outdoor recreation, while section 11) e. is something other than out- door recreation. This is primarily meant to include the consideration of an indoor recreation facility supported by both cities at some future time. It provides for the consideration of whatever the present and future councils of Lafayette and Louisville and the Boulder County. Commissioners would consider to bE~ low intensity recreation. In the initial proposal specific uses were drawn into the agreement, i.e, cemetaries, golf courses, etc. Some of these specific uses did not satisfy other participants in the agreement, consequently this wording was used for clarification. Again, before any- thing all three parties must agree on the use. Mr. Acimovic also stated that at their meeting the question was asked why just two parties could not agree on a specific recreational use. The prok~lem with this is that it has the potential of starting to lobby on the issue and this is trying to be avoided. Councilman Leary Conunented that he was hopeful that the pro- Possibility of Adding perties north of South Boulder Road would Land to the North of also be in~^luded in the agreement and felt South Boulder Road that the agreement was only doing part of the job by excluding those. Mr. Acimovic stated that initially they sug- gested that the Pow Wow property be included. This agreement specifies properties that are in the County and as everyone was aware the Pow Wow property had been annexed to Louis- vil:Le as well as other properties to the north of South Boulder Road. Their second recommendation would include a section in the agreement which would discuss the Pow Wow property but the County had no recom- mendation at that time because it was not in ithe County. At some future time the agreement can be amended as stated in 14. of ithe agreement and this issue can be dis- cussed for consideration to add more land. Mr. Leary felt: that the dialog should be conltinued and more land be added in the future.