My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1984 09 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1984 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1984 09 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:23 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 3:53:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/18/1984
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1984 09 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9/18/84 Page -4- <br />1) Identify feasibility alternative <br />interchange locations <br />2) Define and analyze alternatives <br />3) Evaluate alternatives and recommend <br />preferred alternatives <br />4) Financial considerations <br />5) Documentation <br />6) Local involvement <br />Mr. Yoshioka stated that there hasn't been <br />a lot of money available through tradi- <br />tional funding sources, i.e. the Federal <br />Government who would match 90% of the cost, <br />and we would have to come up wtih 10%. <br />Therefore, the trend has been to go into <br />private financing or cooperative financing <br />of transportation improvements. These are <br />in the form of Metro Districts, Special <br />Districts, cooperative efforts between the <br />State, County, and cities. This question <br />hasn't yet been examined; but is an impor- <br />tant part of the study. This will be handled <br />by one of their sub-consultants TransPlan, <br />Inc. out of Boulder. <br />Meetings are held each month and the meeting <br />is a cooperative one between Broomfield, <br />Louisville, County of Boulder, DRCOG and <br />the State Highway Department. Other cities <br />and counties are invited to attend. In <br />addition they plan to have 2 public meetings <br />in Phase II. When the Phase II study has <br />been completed it will be presented to <br />the Louisville City Council, Louisville <br />Planning Commission, Broomfield Council and <br />Planning Commission, Boulder Planning Com- <br />mission and County Commissioners. Alterna- <br />tive locations will be dropped off to a <br />maximum of 4 and after extensive evaluation <br />one will be determined. The negative as <br />well as the positive aspects of the evalu- <br />ation is a requirement of DRCOG when you <br />go in for an amendment. <br />When an interchange is put in at any lo- <br />cation, one of the primary criteria that <br />DRCOG, the State Highway Dept. and the Federal <br />Highwy Commission look at is does the high- <br />way serve more than just a local function, <br />and what is the connectability to the regional <br />system? Mr. Yoshioka also stated that be- <br />cause this is part of a US highway, part <br />of the amendment process will have to be <br />an enviornmental assessment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.