City Council Minutes 1984 08 21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

8/21/84 Page -15- Council questions and comments. In reply to Councilman Leary's question, Mr. Pliska stated that the only other lot not built on on Continental View Drive was across the street east of his lot, none on either side of his lot. Mr. Pliska also stated that .the heighth of his residence would be 27' which is 8' below the re- quirement of 35' as stated in the City or- dinance. He also stated that there were no convent requirements on his lot, just those across the street. Mayor Meier stated that he did not feel that the City dealt with convenants. This was the sub-divider's affair and not enforceable by the City. Therefore, he did not feel that Mr. Pliska would have to be tied to any other heighth limitations than those required by the City. Councilman Leary Commented if the home is under construction, and if it is 2' above the existing covenant, that we put a condition in that it doesn't go higher than 27'. He felt that it should stay at that level. Mayor Meier disagreed stating that as long as Mr. Pliska's residence is in conformance with the City' s requirements this condition need not be added. Councilman Leary commented that this was done with Parcel B in the Homart development and felt that anytime Council decides they want to, for some reason, restrict a heighth of a building, there is nothing saying it can't be done. Kenneth J. Pliska, Sr. Mr. Pliska stated that he had been open throughout the proceedings and he guessed that if the 27' heighth was a requirement for the annexation, he would have to go along with that. He would just feel that the or- dinance that he is intending to comply with says 35'. He stated that he was well below this by 8'; if it were 27' 2" he would not want to feel in violation of an ordiance. He wished to abide by the law and he was