Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />June 1, 2004 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> <br />Council member Brown asked Mr. Pederson about the issue of affordable housing. Mr. <br />Pederson voiced his desire to discuss affordable housing with the City officials. <br /> <br />Council member Brown asked Planning Director Paul Wood if any research had been <br />done to ascertain whether property values at the Cherrywood Subdivision have gone <br />down. Wood responded no. <br /> <br />Council member Keany asked for a comparison of the number of employees in the <br />previously proposed office building to the number of residents in the proposed lofts. <br />Pederson estimated the 132 employees would be comparable to the number of residents. <br />JeffPederson compared the 130 parking spaces for the office building to the 132 parking <br />spaces proposed for the lofts. He stated the number of people and uses would be similar. <br /> <br />Council member Keany asked Pederson to address the increase in building, footprint and <br />the difference in property tax between the office building and the lofts. Pederson stated <br />the building footprint increased from 19,000 SF to 30,000 SF, or 36%, and the property <br />tax for residential is $2,600 less than the office building. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk voiced his appreciation of Pederson addressing affordable housing. He asked <br />where the residents would go to access a park. Pederson stated the Centennial Business <br />Park provides pedestrian walkways. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk voiced his concerns relative to the timing of the project and to the possibility <br />of setting precedence. He asked Pederson if he has contacted any of the homeowners in <br />the Cherrywood subdivision. Pederson responded no. <br /> <br />Council member Keany asked for retail value of the property tax of residential versus <br />commercial. Planning Director Wood stated the property tax for the residential unit <br />would be approximately $6,300 and $9,000 for the office building. <br /> <br />Council Discussion: Council member Brown stated the Council should judge the <br />proposal on its merits and suggested continued discussion. He noted the Council has not <br />put a moratorium on development proposals, and affordable housing is desirable. He <br />stated the proposal would be in close proximity to the Recreation Center, Skate Park, <br />Hockey Rink, and the Arboretum. Council member Levihn voiced his frustration in <br />delaying the project, while waiting for a new citywide comprehensive development plan. <br />Council member Van Pelt voiced her belief the project is desirable. Council member <br />Keany voiced his concern over the loss of the view corridor, and his belief the proposal is <br />an inappropriate use on this property. Council member Marsella voiced her support <br />of the project, where people could work, walk and shop in Louisville. She supported <br />affordable housing and the recommendation of the Planning Commission. She stated her <br />desire that the new comp plan has more mixed-uses. Mayor Sisk's concern centered on <br />the increased footprint of the proposal and increased traffic along McCaslin Blvd. <br /> <br /> <br />