My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2017 11 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY BOARD
>
2010-2019 Sustainability Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
2017 Sustainability Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2017 11 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:43:27 AM
Creation date
11/17/2017 9:40:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
SUSABPKT 2017 11 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A recommendation refers to a specific action that could be taken in order to meet the strategy given in the 2016 Sustainability Action Plan. <br />Note: This se <br />Method <br />To create this 2 -Year Work Plan, the following method and framework was applied: <br />1) Input. Sustainability Input Interviews were conducted with relevant department heads, as well as with select stakeholders within departments, <br />in order to capture sustainability input regarding the 57 strategies outlined in the SAP. These interviews not only provided critical information <br />regarding the ability to complete these projects and resources required, but it also made the process of determining projects an inclusive one, <br />helping to ensure collaboration and greater success to meet the strategies. In all, the 2 -Year Work Plan represents input from more than 22 staff <br />stakeholders across all departments in the City, including relevant department heads, the Louisville Sustainability Advisory Board, City Council <br />(ongoing) and the public (future). <br />2) Research. Using the input and direction provided, existing programs and projects in the City of Louisville were further researched across <br />departments. Neighboring communities were interviewed as well in order to gain insight regarding technical soundness, best practices, and <br />lessons learned. <br />3) Synthesis. Findings from both the research and input were synthesized and processed into a list of recommendations, with the goal to fulfill the <br />strategies outlined in the SAP, taking into consideration the goals and objectives of the Sustainability Sub -Program Key Performance Indicators. <br />4) PMEgion. T� prioritize the recommendations, each was measured by the following factors: stakeholders, time required to implement the <br />strategy, funding expectations, and importance relative to Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The following weights were assigned and applied in order <br />to give a final prioritization score on a scale of 0 (low) —12 (high): <br />Funding <br />Scale: 1 (least availability of funding) through 5 (highest availability of funding) <br />• 1= Requires additional budget <br />• +3 = Likely to find all or partial funds (i.e. through grants) <br />DRAFT 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.