My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2017 11 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2017 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2017 11 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:00 PM
Creation date
12/4/2017 11:58:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2017 11 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 6, 2017 <br />Page 11 of 17 <br />Mr Oberholzer said as owners they are open to other options and willing to take the <br />time if it is needed Their understanding was they had no other options and want to <br />maintain some of the structure and onginality of the sign. <br />Mayor Muckle supported looking at other options Councilmember Leh felt looking at the <br />criteria on the table, Council should not continue but deny this application and let the <br />owner move on to other options. <br />Director Zuccaro stated the planning department may be able to grant some sign <br />waivers through a PUD process and a Board of Adjustment vanance <br />Attorney Light stated the options are a motion to approve and if it fails, bring back a <br />resolution not to landmark, or a continuance <br />Mayor Muckle moved to disapprove the landmark and direct staff to work with applicant <br />on other options Attorney Light recommended against tying the two together as the <br />items require different processes under the municipal code. Motion died <br />Councilmember Keany moved to continue Resolution No 65, Senes 2017 to the <br />December 5, 2017 meeting. Mayor Muckle seconded Voice vote 4-3, Councilmember <br />Leh, Councilmember Loo, and Councilmember Stolzmann voting no. <br />Attorney Light was asked to clarify the direction to staff He stated it is to get with <br />property owner to see what other options might allow for some city participation that <br />allows for a sign to go in that mimics the current sign, determine and identify a path <br />determining whether it is possible to install a new sign mimicking the current one and <br />then advising Council whether it is <br />Councilmember Loo felt this was missing key elements Attorney Light stated staff <br />needs to identify what elements are involved in pursuing this other path and if money in <br />the HPF can be used to achieve this type of iconic design. He wanted to clarify no <br />decision was made on whether the grant funds are available and if so, how much, or if <br />so under what conditions That will have to come back to Council if staff can find a path <br />forward <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton moved to continue Resolution No 66, Series 2017 to December <br />5, 2017. Mayor Muckle seconded. Voice vote 6-1 Councilmember Stolzmann voting no. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1747, SERIES 2017 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16 AND <br />TITLE 17 OF THE LOUISVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SUBDIVISION <br />APPLICATIONS, AND MODIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL PROCESSES — 2ND <br />READING — PUBLIC HEARING (advertised Daily Camera 10/08/17) <br />Attorney Light introduced the ordinance on second reading and public heanng <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.