My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 09 23
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2008 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2008 09 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:36:18 AM
Creation date
12/10/2008 1:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
5F6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2008 09 23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />September 23, 2008 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />Director Wood said that there is a new element being added to the Plan concerning <br />sustainable environments brought forward by the Resource Conservation Advisory <br />Board (LRCAB). Director Wood stated that they are currently updating tables and <br />maps in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Director Wood reminded Council that they had approved a contract with RRC for <br />producing demographic information for the Comprehensive Plan. Director Wood said <br />that RRC would not be able to produce deliverables in time and that the City is using <br />resources available to update the demographic information and will not be using the <br />funds allotted for RRC. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk asked Director Wood to expand on the collaboration with LRCAB. <br />Director Wood said the environment element included energy, habitat and water <br />conservation. Director Wood also said that the they compared the document <br />provided by LRCAB with the current Comprehensive Plan to see if the current plan <br />already incorporated elements of the LRCAB document and recommended to the <br />Planning Commission to eliminate any redundancy between the two documents. <br /> <br />Director Wood also expressed his appreciation to Becky Hogan, EDge Consulting, <br />for her input on the economic development section of the Plan. <br /> <br />3. UpdatelDiscussion - Fiscal Impact Model <br />Kevin Watson, Director of Finance, gave a brief background about the Fiscal <br />Impact Model and went over the memorandum included in the packet that <br />included the limitations and changes to the assumptions of the original Leland <br />model but pointed out the methodology is the same. Director Watson also <br />pointed out that the model was designed for a global look of the City not for <br />specific areas of development, although it could be modified for specific use. <br />Director Watson also thanked John Leary for his input and assistance in updating <br />the model. <br /> <br />Director Watson pointed out the following limitations of the model: <br />o The model considers only operational revenue and expenditures of the <br />General Fund <br />o The model assumes that capital investment impacts will be similar to <br />historical impacts. <br />o The model analyzes the impacts of new growth only and assumes a current <br />fiscal balance. <br />o The model analyzes the impact of new growth on a relatively large scale. <br />o The model analyzes the impact of new growth over a period of time, not at a <br />specific point in time. <br /> <br />Director Watson pointed out the following changes to the assumptions of the <br />model: <br />o Property Tax - The market values and the construction values have been <br />increased an average of 25% over the 2005 model. The 2008 model focuses <br />solely on the General Fund operations, excludes the debt service levy and <br />uses just the general levy of 5.184. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.