Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2000

Home Browse Search

N MEMORANDUM TO Members of the Louisville Building Code Board of Appeals FROM Thomas Talboom, Chief Building Official DATE September 14, 2000 SUBJECT Adoption of the 1997 Uniform Plumbing Code At the request of the members present at the August 24, 2000, meeting of the Building Codes Board of Appeals, I am herein presenting staff recommendations to you I have only had time to do a cursory review of the 1997 Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) because of the short time frame required by the City Council to adopt the code The 1997 UPC has undergone some major revisions including entire chapters revised or added and appendices moved into the body of the code. Please consider the following comments as regards the adoption of the UPC in your recommendations to the City Council > The Colorado Plumbing Board has not adopted Chapter 1 of the UPC, Administration The. UPC over the last six years of code change cycles has been including provisions that are already specified and regulated in the Building, Fire and Mechanical Codes There should, therefore, be no conflict with amending this chapter to satisfy the local needs of the City of Louisville. Refer to the amended UPC Section 101 4 1 4, Conflicts Between Codes, in the attached ordinance. Typical examples are the addition of fire- stopping provisions that are in conflict with the adopted building and fire codes and the addition of provisions for fuel burning appliances and gas pipe that may be in conflict with the adopted mechanical code. ➢ See amended UPC Section 103 1 3, Licensing The City of Louisville has it's own contractor licensing requirements. Contractor licensing is not a provision that should be of concern in construction codes. > See amended UPC Section 413.6, Food Service Establishments, to read "Food service establishments with an occupant load of 20 less shall be exempted from the requirement for the installation of a urinal in the men's room as specified in UPC.Table 4-1 " This would require the minimum fixtures to,be only one water closet and one lavatory in both the men's and women's toilet rooms and exempt Louisville from the "potty-parity" footnote #14 in Table 4-1 The Colorado Plumbing Board gave the City of Louisville an exception to these provisions in an appeal hearing for exception to the code in 1996 This amendment would allow most small "take-out" type restaurants to realize reduced costs in material, labor and possibly a tap size