Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 12 13

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes October 11, 2018 Page 13 of 17 necessary, but they wanted the Commission to consider how they would enforce the addition of parking spaces in the future. Zuccaro stated that 4.5.1 in the Design Guidelines was what the Commission was reviewing the application against. He added that the practicality of the parking issue was addressed by having a letter or a note on the PUD that included a reference to not parking on the street for visitors or employees. Ritchie added that the use of metal was an accent and so would not require a waiver. However, the Commission could carry a recommendation for a waiver request from the Commission to the Council. Staff based their decision on the metal on the percentage of the building covered by the material. Moline asked if the Pearl iZumi building had received a waiver for its metal. Ritchie clarified that the CCDSG standards were applicable in that case, not the IDDSG which were relevant to this application. Brauneis asked if the history of wanting to avoid cheap, industrial metal sheds informed the distinction between metal as a building material and metal as an accent. Ritchie replied that his assessment sounded accurate. Hsu asked where the parking note was in the resolution. Ritchie stated that there should be a reference to a condition in the resolution. Moline asked if there was a way to trigger something at the sale of the property or at the change of use to reexamine the parking requirements. Ritchie stated that the City tended to review changes of use, though the City was not always alerted about changes of ownership. Changes in title could also be a trigger. Moline asked what would happen after the City sent out a letter and the property did not comply. Zuccaro replied that the City could take legal action. He added that the City usually gets notice of new ownership through a tenant finish. Rice stated that he felt certain if Vaisala employees and visitors started parking on the street the Association would alert the City. He did not know how to get much better than that as a trigger. Moline stated that enforcement issues were triggered by complaints and few people would complain, especially since there were already parking issues in the area. Brauneis stated that this situation was different since there was a note on the PUD about parking, which was not present on other PUDs. 15